The “Aquinas at 800” conference marks a definitive moment in the dialogue between classical scholasticism and the modern academy. At the University of Notre Dame, the “Theology: Religious Epistemology” panel investigated how the thought of the Common Doctor remains a vital strategic resource for reconciling the certainty of faith with the rigors of reason. By revisiting the Thomistic framework, the panelists demonstrated that faith is not a subjective sentiment but a structured participation in Divine Wisdom.
The Wisdom of the Simple
Noah Krueger interrogated the “pedagogical hierarchy” of faith, traditionally seen as a unidirectional flow from the learned to the simple. However, Krueger illuminated a profound “inversion of wisdom” within the Thomistic corpus. He argued that the simple can teach the learned through “subjective greatness”—the depth of their habituation to grace. Crucially, Krueger identified an “apophatic capacity” in the simple: much as a temperate person instinctively recoils from luxury, the faithful person possesses an “inclination to the contrary” regarding heresy. By providing a sensible exemplum of lived truth, the simple remind the learned that the telos of all sacred science is humble union with the Divine.
Eucharistic Assimilation
Dr. Daniel Gordon shifted the focus toward the sacramental and trinitarian dimensions of knowledge. Utilizing the concept of “instrumental causality,” he explored how the Eucharist serves as spiritual food that, unlike physical nourishment, changes the eater into itself. Gordon employed the Augustinian distinction between the “use” (usus) of temporal means and the “enjoyment” (fruitio) of the eternal End. This assimilation is specifically trinitarian; through the gratia gratum faciens (grace that makes pleasing), the believer is Likened to the Son through faith and the Spirit through charity. This culminates in sapida scientia—a “savory knowledge” that allows for a formal, experiential participation in the Divine life.
The Justification of Belief
Dr. Mats Wahlberg addressed the epistemic foundations of faith through a “Testimonial Interpretation,” specifically engaging the formal object of faith. He contrasted this model with the “Reliabilism” of Ross and Stump and the “Supernatural Externalism” of John Jenkins. Wahlberg argued that while externalist models rely on a supernatural “design plan,” his testimonial model posits that the mere fact of Divine Testimony constitutes sufficient objective justification. To maintain intellectual rigor, he introduced “doxastic responsibility”—the requirement that the believer remain rationally sensitive to their epistemic environment. Faith, thus, is an act of the intellect moved by the will, anchored in the supreme reliability of the Divine Speaker rather than internal wishful thinking.
These three perspectives form a unified vision: a journey toward God that is modeled by the humble, realized through sacramental union, and justified by the authority of the Word.