2.1 Introduction: A Hopeful Conversation on an Intractable Problem
In a discussion that counters the narrative of despair surrounding homelessness, leaders from research, government, and community-based services came together to share a powerful story of hope and success. The webinar, hosted by King County in partnership with the University of Notre Dame’s Wilson Sheehan Lab for Economic Opportunities (LEO) and MIT’s Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL), highlighted that when the right partners collaborate around proven, evidence-based strategies, homelessness is a solvable problem. Featuring insights from Santa Clara County, the nonprofit Mary’s Place in King County, and academic experts, the conversation provided a blueprint for building effective prevention systems—a topic of critical importance in our current moment.
2.2 The Power of Evidence in a Time of Rising Homelessness
David Phillips, a research professor at LEO, framed the discussion around a critical debate. With homelessness rising nationally, a common assumption is that current strategies are failing. This pessimistic view suggests that had we done something different, outcomes would be better. However, Phillips presented a more powerful, evidence-based counterfactual: today’s programs are successfully fighting immense headwinds like soaring rent and the pandemic. Without these interventions, the crisis would be far worse. The proof is in the data: while overall homelessness has increased, veteran homelessness has been cut in half over the past decade due to strategic investments in proven programs like HUD-VASH. Rigorous evaluation proves these interventions work, demonstrating that we can make progress even in difficult circumstances.
2.3 The Santa Clara Model: A Blueprint for Prevention
The Santa Clara County homelessness prevention system offers a compelling blueprint for success. Launched in 2017 as a public-private partnership led by Destination Home, the system was designed to address a critical gap: preventing homelessness before it starts. Grounded in a “whatever it takes” philosophy, the model provides flexible financial assistance and supportive services. From its inception, the system was built on a foundation of data, integrating provider services into the county’s Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) and partnering with LEO to evaluate its impact. The results are stunning: what began as a pilot serving 200 families has scaled into a county-sustained, nearly $30 million system that serves over 2,500 households annually. It is a model rooted in equity, with 90% of households served being extremely low-income and 90% being people of color.
2.4 From Replication to Adaptation: Spreading Success
The success in Santa Clara raises a crucial question: can this model work elsewhere? The partnership between LEO and Mary’s Place, a service provider for families in King County, Washington, provides the answer. Allison, Director of Community Impact at Mary’s Place, explained that their team was able to accelerate its work by learning directly from Santa Clara’s experience, adopting validated tools like a refined vulnerability screening questionnaire and avoiding the need to “reinvent the wheel.” However, she stressed that “replication… is not just a direct copy and paste.” Mary’s Place adapted the model to its unique context, including its specific focus on families with children and different local funding structures. This process underscores a vital lesson: scaling success requires adapting proven principles to local needs and expertise.
2.5 Conclusion: A National Movement for Prevention
The overarching message of the webinar is clear: homelessness prevention is a proven, cost-effective, and deeply humane strategy. Building on this momentum, a new initiative is underway to expand this model in 10 diverse communities across the United States. This is a direct federal advocacy strategy born of necessity; as panelist Chad Bhoras noted, there is currently “very little to no dedicated targeted homelessness prevention funding at a federal level,” with the approach not even formally recognized by HUD as an intervention. This effort represents more than just scaling a program; it is the beginning of a national movement to build the evidence base needed to create systemic change and establish prevention as a core, funded strategy.