Bridging the Divide 2020 – Exploring Racial and Social Injustice and Inequality in America

Subscribe to the ThinkND podcast on Apple, Spotify, or Google.

Featured Speakers:

  • Veronica Root Martinez, Professor of Law and Director of the Law School’s Program on Ethics, Compliance, & Inclusion
  • David Hooker, Associate Professor of the Practice of Conflict Transformation and Peacebuilding in the Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies
  • Rev. Thomas J. McDonagh, C.S.C., Associate Professor of Economics at the University of Notre Dame

The third session of the Bridging the Divide series explored the causes of racial and economic inequalities in American today. The discussion was moderated by Veronica Root Martinez, Professor of Law and Director of the Law School’s Program on Ethics, Compliance, & Inclusion and included speakers David Hooker, Associate Professor of the Practice of Conflict Transformation and Peacebuilding in the Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies and Jim Sullivan, Rev. Thomas J. McDonagh, C.S.C., Associate Professor of Economics at the University of Notre Dame. The discussion aimed to confront some persistent inequalities in America, some of the long standing factors that contribute to them, and some ways to effectively address these injustices. 

The first topic of discussion focused on some of the historical sources of income inequality in the U.S. Hooker shared history about policies in America, such as the exclusion of African American soldiers from the GI Bill, that have contributed to wealth divisions. Hooker emphasized the benefits of land ownership that African Americans were excluded from, contributing to a lack of wealth building possibilities and persisting income disparities. Sullivan discussed a more recent cause of income inequality over the past 40 years. He shared that the largest contributor to these economic injustices is skill-biased technological change, which he explained as advances in technology that benefit high-skilled workers, and penalize low-skilled workers. There is more demand for high-skilled workers, and less demand for low-skilled workers as technology often replaces those jobs. This creates less job opportunity for these low-skilled, often low-income workers, creating larger wealth divisions in America. 

Another key topic discussed was why communities of color may not be as active in the high-skilled labor market versus the low-skilled labor market. Hooker circled back to a previous point of the history of people of color having minimal opportunities to be homeowners. He built on this idea by explaining how homeownership is the basis from which public schools are funded. So, disparate values of homeownership leads to underfunded schools, which means that children in these schools have less access to technology, thus less exposure to technological skills to move them into high-skilled jobs. Sullivan added to this point by explaining how a lot of research shows that a lack of opportunity at a young age, such as high-quality education not being available to certain demographics, has lifelong implications. 

A final major point discussed was how the COVID-19 pandemic hit communities of color, how this impacted economic disparities, and how the government should adjust its response. Sullivan explained how stimulus payments and expanded unemployment insurance benefits initially helped lift people out of poverty, but since these relief packages are temporary, poverty rates rose dramatically over time. He shared that the government needs to expand the labor market and expand any type of relief packages as there have been clear winners and losers as a result of the pandemic. Hooker built on this idea that stimulus checks are not going to be the solution to poverty, but rather grassroot, local level policy changes are needed to address the highly complex issue of poverty and economic disparities in America, and provide more job security for those living in constant precarity about a lack of access to sustaining resources. 

Visit the event page for more.


  • Racial and economic inequalities have a long history of contributing to the persisting injustices in American society today, a major one being the lack of opportunity for African Americans to be homeowners. 
  • Advanced technology is wiping out low-skilled workers and creating more jobs for high-skilled workers, causing a rise in income inequality in America. 
  • A lack of quality education and opportunities at a young age, due to the community one is raised in, has long term implications that persist for one’s whole life. 
  • The demographic group that has been hit the hardest by COVID-19 and has experienced the largest rise in poverty has been the black and brown community where poverty has risen by five percentage points. 
  • The way in which the government considers and treats poverty must be reevaluated; simply giving out checks is not going to solve the problem. There must be programs at grassroots levels that address the lack of opportunities and quality education available in low income communities. 

  • “There’s growing consensus about the largest contributor to the sharp rise in earnings inequality particularly seen since the late ‘70s and has persisted is due to what economists call skill biased technological change. That sounds like a technical thing but it’s really a simple idea. We’ve had incredible advances in technology over the past several decades, and that technology has not been neutral in the sense that there are some winners and some losers. And it turns out that the nature of this technology that we’ve experienced has rewarded high-skilled workers in the sense that there’s more demand for them, and penalized low-skilled workers, less demand for them. What’s happening is the technology is replacing these low skilled jobs.” — Jim Sullivan, 11:56
  • “There’s a lot of research showing that a lack of opportunities at a very young age has a lifelong impact, so if these types of opportunities like a high quality childhood education are not available to certain ethnic groups, they are going to be paying the price their whole lives.” — Jim Sullivan, 15:07 
  • “The measure of poverty, the idea that one $1,200 check or continuing $600 every other week is probably suggesting that we could rethink because if may be that temporarily for a week or two they are able to have access to moderate to substantive living, but I don’t know that that actually will remove them from the experience of poverty, the precarity that comes with the lack of access to sustaining resources” — David Hooker, 19:23 
  • “These issues surrounding poverty, how do you really help someone? How do you see them as a full complete person with dignity? This is also super complex, and so part of what is happening in America right now is we are seeing the ways in which the complexity surrounding race and the complexity surrounding economic justice are intersecting, and they are intersecting in the public eye in a really remarkable way and hopefully in a way that is going to allow  for there to be meaningful change going forward.” —Veronica Root Martinez, 32:25
  • “If you look at policies, more modern policies, that have contributed to wealth divisions and inequalities you can just look at the exclusion of African American soldiers from GI Bill, the benefits associated with housing and education, and then the exclusion of African American farmers from the agricultural loan programs that often were necessary for farmers to retain their land from planting season to planting season, so 92 percent of previously owned African American land has been lost during that period and homeownership and everything that goes along with wealth building possibilities.” — David Hooker, 10:19